Original by Michael Weiss 1994.

In a word: yes. In two sentences: the Doppler shift explanation is a linear approximation to the "stretched light" explanation. Switching from one viewpoint to the other amounts to a change of coordinate systems in (curved) spacetime.

A detailed explanation requires looking at Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) models of spacetime. The famous "expanding balloon speckled with galaxies" provides a visual analogy for one of these; like any analogy, it will mislead you if taken too literally, but handled with caution it can furnish some insight.

Draw a latitude/longitude grid on the balloon. These define *comoving
coordinates*. Imagine a couple of speckles ("galaxies") embedded in the rubber
surface. The comoving coordinates of the speckles don't change as the balloon
expands, but the distance between the speckles steadily increases. In comoving
coordinates, we say that the speckles don't move, but "space itself" stretches between
them.

A bug starts crawling from one speckle to the other. A second after the first bug leaves, his brother follows him. (Think of the bugs as two light pulses, or successive wave crests in a beam of light.) Clearly the separation between the bugs will increase during their journey. In comoving coordinates, light is "stretched" during its journey.

Now we switch to a different coordinate system, this one valid only in a neighborhood
(but one large enough to cover both speckles). Imagine a clear, flexible,
non-stretching patch, attached to the balloon at one speckle. The patch clings to
the surface of the balloon, which slides beneath it as the balloon inflates. (The
bugs crawl along *under* the patch.) We draw a coordinate grid on the
patch. In the patch coordinates, the second speckle recedes from the first
speckle. And so in patch coordinates, we can regard the redshift as a Doppler
shift.

Is this visually appealing? I think so. However, this explanation glosses over one crucial point: the time coordinate. FRW spacetimes come fully equipped with a specially distinguished time coordinate (called the comoving or cosmological time). For example, a comoving observer could set her clock by the average density of surrounding speckles, or by the temperature of the Cosmic Background Radiation. (From a purely mathematical standpoint, the comoving time coordinate is singled out by a certain symmetry property.)

We have many choices of time coordinate to go with the space coordinates drawn on our
patch. Let's use cosmological time. Notice that this is *not* the
choice usually made in Special Relativity: though the two speckles separate rapidly, their
cosmological clocks remain synchronized. Bugs embarking on their journey from the
"moving" speckle appear to crawl "upstream" against flowing space as they head towards the
"home" speckle. The current diminishes as they approach home. (In other words,
bug speed is anisotropic in these coordinates.) These differences from the usual SR
picture are symptoms of a deeper fact: besides the obvious "spatial" curvature of the
balloon's surface, FRW spacetimes have "temporal" curvature as well. Indeed, not all
FRW spacetimes exhibit spatial curvature, but (with one exception) all have temporal
curvature.

You can work out the magnitude of the redshift using patch coordinates. I leave
this as an exercise, with a couple of hints. (1) Since bug speed is anisotropic far
from the home speckle, consider also a patch attached to the "moving" speckle.
Compute the initial distance between the bugs (the "wavelength") in both patch coordinate
systems, using the standard *nonrelativistic* Doppler formula for a stationary
source, moving receiver. (2) Now think about how the bug distance changes as the
bugs journey to the home speckle (this time sticking with home patch coordinates).
The bug distance does *not* propagate unchanged. Consider instead the analog
of the period of a light wave: the time between bug crossings of a grid line on the
patch. This *does* propagate almost unchanged, *provided* the rate of
balloon expansion stays pretty much the same throughout the bugs' perilous trek. The
final result: the magnitude of the redshift, computed using Doppler's formula, agrees to
first order with magnitude computed using the "stretched light" explanation. (To the
cognoscenti: the assumptions are that Hx<<1 and (dH/dt)x<<1, where H(t)=dR(t)/dt, R(t) is
the scale factor, t is cosmological time, and x is the average distance between the
"speckles" (comoving geodesics) during the course of the journey.)

(This long winded "proof of equivalence" between the Doppler and "stretched light" explanations substitutes a paragraph of imagery for a half page of calculus.)

Let me close by emphasizing the word "approximation" from the first paragraph of this entry. The Doppler explanation fails for very large redshifts, for then we must consider how Hubble's "constant" changes over the course of the journey.

Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, *Gravitation*, chapter 29.

M.V.Berry, *Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation*, chapter 6.

Steven Weinberg, *The First Three Minutes*, chapter 2, especially pages 13 and
30.